{"id":1560,"date":"2016-08-22T13:55:49","date_gmt":"2016-08-22T12:55:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.davidhing.com\/?p=1560"},"modified":"2016-08-22T14:04:42","modified_gmt":"2016-08-22T13:04:42","slug":"no-mans-sky-space-busy-people","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.davidhing.com\/chaotic-tortoise\/2016\/08\/no-mans-sky-space-busy-people\/","title":{"rendered":"No Man\u2019s Sky: Space for busy people"},"content":{"rendered":"

It takes two years to train as an astronaut. They must undergo intensive training in how the space shuttle and International Space Station functions, further sciences, medical procedures and survival training. If they are to crew the ISS, they will also need to learn Russian so they can communicate with the Russian Mission Control centre. You also need to be selected in the first place and applications are numerous whilst places on the training program are few. There are no clear guaranteed routes in, but it\u2019s safe to say you have to be pretty high up in your field to qualify.<\/span><\/p>\n

It takes 45 minutes to watch an episode of Star Trek. Anyone can watch Star Trek.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Pulse

A stunning blend of Star Wars’ jump to hyperspace and the psychedelic colours of 2001: A Space Odyssey<\/p><\/div>\n

No Man\u2019s Sky is to most of the space game genre what Star Trek is to real world space travel. <\/span><\/p>\n

Of course, a lot of players dabbling in the space game genre like the idea of massive universes with planets and stars respecting the right scales in terms of travel, but then once you get down to it, there\u2019s a lot of waiting around between moments of wonder and sometimes we don’t have time to wait. <\/span><\/p>\n

No Man\u2019s Sky cuts out a lot of the waiting. Instead it jumps from moment of wonder to moment of wonder very quickly. You blast off from a planet and leave the atmosphere, you engage the warp drive, you arrive in a new system, you land on a new planet, you name your discovery and you come face-to-face with a giant flying hippo-wasp. The problem with this is that if you present a moment of wonder too many times in quick succession, then it stops becoming a moment of wonder and instead becomes the norm. Ironically, an experience that is literally full of wonder is not wonderful, but merely just ok.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\"No

One of the first worlds I landed on had these bizarre sphere-trees everywhere. I’ve not seen them anywhere else since.<\/p><\/div>\n

According to developer Hello Games, No Man\u2019s Sky has 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 planets in its universe. It would therefore take approximately 5 billion years, If one were to visit every single planet without stopping for lunch, to see everything that No Man\u2019s Sky has to offer.<\/span><\/p>\n

Five billion years to see everything.<\/span><\/p>\n

Or, you know, five hours.<\/span><\/p>\n

It should be clear to anyone, even those without a shred of knowledge on the game development process (and let me be clear, I do only possess a shred myself) that 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 is far too many planets to have been crafted by hand. These are all the entities generated by an algorithm tweaking a set of variables and coming out with a near infinite number of results.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"No

Yup. I meant to do that. Yes I know it’s not a landing pad. Yes I know it’s some kind of mushroom.<\/p><\/div>\n

The number looks a lot less impressive, when you think that something as simple as a four-digit bicycle lock has 10,000 potential solutions. If you therefore have something with a lot more variables than four, then it\u2019s not difficult to see how that number gets big quickly.<\/span><\/p>\n

Of course, that big number is very easy to understand as a product of marketing. It is a technically accurate statistic – the best kind of statistic! Nobody can call it a lie and nobody really cares about the quiet voices that pipe up with qualifiers that it\u2019s maybe too big and would suggest that actually, there is less variety in these different planets than advertised.<\/span><\/p>\n

No Man\u2019s Sky\u2019s simplicity is its strength, not its weakness<\/b><\/h2>\n

No Man\u2019s Sky is space for busy people. If you want something deeper, that exists already. Elite: Dangerous has a to-scale distance between galaxies and planets, planets that orbit stars and a system by which if you see a star in the sky, you can plot a course and fly to it. It also has complex controls that make basic manoeuvres like docking your ship in a space station feel like an event. To land in Elite: Dangerous, you need to:<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Request docking permission<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Enter the station<\/li>\n
  3. Locate your designated landing bay<\/li>\n
  4. Slow down to an appropriate speed<\/li>\n
  5. Deploy landing gear<\/li>\n
  6. Approach landing pad<\/li>\n
  7. Descend<\/li>\n
  8. Make sure the ship is level with the landing pad<\/li>\n
  9. Touchdown<\/li>\n
  10. Disengage engines<\/li>\n
  11. Ensure you do all of the above within an allotted time<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    To land in No Man\u2019s Sky, you:<\/span><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Hold down the land button.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      You don\u2019t even need to do that in a space station – you just fly into the hole in the front.<\/span><\/p>\n

      \"No

      All the space stations are basically the same and require zero skill to land in. I can’t always find the entrances however.<\/p><\/div>\n

      There\u2019s also a lot of dead space and waiting time in Elite: Dangerous between notable\u00a0events. Moments of wonder are spread far and wide, but when you do encounter a breathtaking space anomaly or find yourself gazing out at the star you nearly warped straight into, it does feel like you\u2019ve earned it.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Elite: Dangerous isn’t the only modern example of a space game that players might be comparing No Man’s Sky to. Eve Online also has a comparably large universe and deep systems with regards to ships, loadouts, equipment and economy to say nothing of the complex social emergent multiplayer aspect to the game. In Eve, the quality of your ship is defined by factors including:<\/span><\/p>\n

        \n
      • Mass<\/span><\/li>\n
      • Volume<\/span><\/li>\n
      • Capacity<\/span><\/li>\n
      • Level of technology it can deploy<\/span><\/li>\n
      • Maximum velocity<\/span><\/li>\n
      • Inertia modifier<\/span><\/li>\n
      • Warp speed<\/span><\/li>\n
      • Powergrid output<\/span><\/li>\n
      • CPU Output<\/li>\n
      • Capacitor recharge<\/li>\n
      • Hardpoints<\/li>\n
      • Rig\u00a0slots<\/li>\n
      • Shields<\/li>\n
      • Armour<\/li>\n
      • Ship structure<\/li>\n
      • Shield recharge time<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        In No Man\u2019s Sky, the quality of your ship is defined by:<\/span><\/p>\n

          \n
        • Number of inventory slots you have<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

          This is only a problem if you go in expecting those aspects of depth and complexity and maybe a lot of people did because it looked a bit like a complex space game that we\u2019ve seen before, only with dinosaurs.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Is No Man\u2019s Sky worth \u00a340 right now?<\/b><\/h2>\n

          This is a boring question which befits a boring answer. It depends.<\/span><\/p>\n

          The pre-release hype vs. the actual reality is neatly summarised by this video that I can\u2019t stop watching:<\/span><\/p>\n